Comments on: The Rumors Of Our Death… http://blogs.digium.com/2009/03/26/the-rumors-of-our-death/ A little slice o' Digium. Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:47:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Skype for Asterisk: siamo vivi e vegeti (ed in beta privata) | Libera il VoIP http://blogs.digium.com/2009/03/26/the-rumors-of-our-death/comment-page-1/#comment-21744 Skype for Asterisk: siamo vivi e vegeti (ed in beta privata) | Libera il VoIP Sat, 29 May 2010 20:39:27 +0000 http://blogs.digium.com/?p=3293#comment-21744 [...] un lunghissimo intervento sul proprio blog dal titolo alquanto emblematico (“The Rumors Of Our Death”), uno degli sviluppatori Digium che lavora allo sviluppo di Skype for Asterisk, il primo [...] [...] un lunghissimo intervento sul proprio blog dal titolo alquanto emblematico (“The Rumors Of Our Death”), uno degli sviluppatori Digium che lavora allo sviluppo di Skype for Asterisk, il primo [...]

]]> By: Rod Montgomery http://blogs.digium.com/2009/03/26/the-rumors-of-our-death/comment-page-1/#comment-21043 Rod Montgomery Wed, 05 Aug 2009 05:05:38 +0000 http://blogs.digium.com/?p=3293#comment-21043 The Skype for Asterisk free public beta was released July 30, and expires August 31. Visit the Digium webstore to download the free beta -- http://bit.ly/kFpR5 The Skype for Asterisk free public beta was released July 30, and expires August 31. Visit the Digium webstore to download the free beta — http://bit.ly/kFpR5

]]> By: Whit http://blogs.digium.com/2009/03/26/the-rumors-of-our-death/comment-page-1/#comment-20083 Whit Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:43:33 +0000 http://blogs.digium.com/?p=3293#comment-20083 Looking forward to an update on the global beta and release! Hopefully soon as this integration is going to be totally disruptive to the entire VOIP/PBX landscape. Looking forward to an update on the global beta and release! Hopefully soon as this integration is going to be totally disruptive to the entire VOIP/PBX landscape.

]]> By: Hans W. Urst http://blogs.digium.com/2009/03/26/the-rumors-of-our-death/comment-page-1/#comment-19453 Hans W. Urst Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:08:30 +0000 http://blogs.digium.com/?p=3293#comment-19453 Technical Question: Has digium access to the entire source for chan_skpe under the NDA, or do you get some sort of binary library from them which you have to use/link to? (Or, a bit less polite: I do trust digium pretty far, but i don't trust skype as far as i can spit. If i knew digium has seen/written the code, thats fine by me, but closed skype software won't get within 1000 yards of my server ;-)) Technical Question: Has digium access to the entire source for chan_skpe under the NDA, or do you get some sort of binary library from them which you have to use/link to?

(Or, a bit less polite: I do trust digium pretty far, but i don’t trust skype as far as i can spit. If i knew digium has seen/written the code, thats fine by me, but closed skype software won’t get within 1000 yards of my server ;-) )

]]> By: haha http://blogs.digium.com/2009/03/26/the-rumors-of-our-death/comment-page-1/#comment-18763 haha Sun, 12 Apr 2009 22:00:55 +0000 http://blogs.digium.com/?p=3293#comment-18763 FreeSWITCH will be the reason of your death. Not Skype. FreeSWITCH will be the reason of your death. Not Skype.

]]> By: Tel4all.dk » Blog Archive » Skype for SIP vs. Skype For Asterisk http://blogs.digium.com/2009/03/26/the-rumors-of-our-death/comment-page-1/#comment-18603 Tel4all.dk » Blog Archive » Skype for SIP vs. Skype For Asterisk Tue, 07 Apr 2009 07:18:03 +0000 http://blogs.digium.com/?p=3293#comment-18603 [...] (oversættelse af artikel fra Digium) [...] [...] (oversættelse af artikel fra Digium) [...]

]]> By: thehar v.5 » Skype for Asterisk [SFA] vs Skype for SIP [SFS] http://blogs.digium.com/2009/03/26/the-rumors-of-our-death/comment-page-1/#comment-18453 thehar v.5 » Skype for Asterisk [SFA] vs Skype for SIP [SFS] Tue, 31 Mar 2009 02:58:23 +0000 http://blogs.digium.com/?p=3293#comment-18453 [...] has responded to concerns about the the value of Skype for Asterisk (SFA) after the announcement [...] [...] has responded to concerns about the the value of Skype for Asterisk (SFA) after the announcement [...]

]]> By: Mario S http://blogs.digium.com/2009/03/26/the-rumors-of-our-death/comment-page-1/#comment-18443 Mario S Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:42:36 +0000 http://blogs.digium.com/?p=3293#comment-18443 Steve, Is there any chance at expanding the SFA beta program before its release? Looking for to the additional capabilities! M. Steve,
Is there any chance at expanding the SFA beta program before its release? Looking for to the additional capabilities!

M.

]]> By: Skype on SIP: More Fallout from the Announcement | Voice on the Web http://blogs.digium.com/2009/03/26/the-rumors-of-our-death/comment-page-1/#comment-18343 Skype on SIP: More Fallout from the Announcement | Voice on the Web Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:16:29 +0000 http://blogs.digium.com/?p=3293#comment-18343 [...] Sokol at Digium put up a post, “The Rumors Of Our Death” where he outlines key differentiators of Skype for Asterisk from Skype for SIP (slightly revised [...] [...] Sokol at Digium put up a post, “The Rumors Of Our Death” where he outlines key differentiators of Skype for Asterisk from Skype for SIP (slightly revised [...]

]]> By: Jason Goecke http://blogs.digium.com/2009/03/26/the-rumors-of-our-death/comment-page-1/#comment-18333 Jason Goecke Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:51:33 +0000 http://blogs.digium.com/?p=3293#comment-18333 I noticed you changed the blog post and replaced one of the differentiators: - SFA supports incoming calls directly from SkypeIn DID numbers. SFS does not. With: - SFA calls are encrypted from end-to-end while SFS calls are delivered to the SFS endpoint devices (PBX) as unencrypted RTP streams. While that is true for the beta, which will be UDP/RTP unencrypted, Skype has already committed to TLS/SRTP support this year. As they clearly believe encryption is one of their key values regardless of how the voice is delivered to the end-point. I noticed you changed the blog post and replaced one of the differentiators:

- SFA supports incoming calls directly from SkypeIn DID numbers. SFS does not.

With:

- SFA calls are encrypted from end-to-end while SFS calls are delivered to the SFS endpoint devices (PBX) as unencrypted RTP streams.

While that is true for the beta, which will be UDP/RTP unencrypted, Skype has already committed to TLS/SRTP support this year. As they clearly believe encryption is one of their key values regardless of how the voice is delivered to the end-point.

]]>