<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digium G.729 codec module updated and new performance testing tool released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.digium.com/2009/02/06/digium-g729-codec-module-updated-and-new-performance-testing-tool-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.digium.com/2009/02/06/digium-g729-codec-module-updated-and-new-performance-testing-tool-released/</link>
	<description>A little slice o&#039; Digium.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:47:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugenie Driesenga</title>
		<link>http://blogs.digium.com/2009/02/06/digium-g729-codec-module-updated-and-new-performance-testing-tool-released/comment-page-1/#comment-23319</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugenie Driesenga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.digium.com/?p=2893#comment-23319</guid>
		<description>You completed certain nice points there. I did a search on the matter and found the majority of folks will have the same opinion with your blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You completed certain nice points there. I did a search on the matter and found the majority of folks will have the same opinion with your blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goldenberg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.digium.com/2009/02/06/digium-g729-codec-module-updated-and-new-performance-testing-tool-released/comment-page-1/#comment-23282</link>
		<dc:creator>Goldenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 11:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.digium.com/?p=2893#comment-23282</guid>
		<description>Hi There
It&#039;s a really nice post you have here.
I found the information to be corrrect but do you know anything about Khao Lak island in Thailand?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi There<br />
It&#8217;s a really nice post you have here.<br />
I found the information to be corrrect but do you know anything about Khao Lak island in Thailand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.digium.com/2009/02/06/digium-g729-codec-module-updated-and-new-performance-testing-tool-released/comment-page-1/#comment-23056</link>
		<dc:creator>Harman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 05:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.digium.com/?p=2893#comment-23056</guid>
		<description>nice post man, my site coming up soon, i write about web design and wordpress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice post man, my site coming up soon, i write about web design and wordpress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellner</title>
		<link>http://blogs.digium.com/2009/02/06/digium-g729-codec-module-updated-and-new-performance-testing-tool-released/comment-page-1/#comment-23054</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 20:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.digium.com/?p=2893#comment-23054</guid>
		<description>Interesting, really nice post for my work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, really nice post for my work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Davenport</title>
		<link>http://blogs.digium.com/2009/02/06/digium-g729-codec-module-updated-and-new-performance-testing-tool-released/comment-page-1/#comment-21948</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Davenport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 14:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.digium.com/?p=2893#comment-21948</guid>
		<description>Howdy,

Utility works just fine for me on an x86_64 AMD CPU on Ubuntu 10.04.  Are you sure you&#039;re actually on a 64-bit system?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howdy,</p>
<p>Utility works just fine for me on an x86_64 AMD CPU on Ubuntu 10.04.  Are you sure you&#8217;re actually on a 64-bit system?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.digium.com/2009/02/06/digium-g729-codec-module-updated-and-new-performance-testing-tool-released/comment-page-1/#comment-21830</link>
		<dc:creator>omar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 17:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.digium.com/?p=2893#comment-21830</guid>
		<description>Hi
The benchg729 utility doesn&#039;t work for x86_64 architecture. I wrote the following command line.

# wget http://downloads.digium.com/pub/telephony/codec_g729/benchg729/x86-64/benchg729-1.0.7-x86_64 -O benchg729

# chmod 500 /root/benchg729

# /root/benchg729

And the error is:

-bash: /root/benchg729: cannot execute binary file

Why?

Then I tried with x84_32 architecture with the following commands.

# wget http://downloads.digium.com/pub/telephony/codec_g729/benchg729/x86-32/benchg729-1.0.7-x86_32 -O benchg729

# chmod 500 /root/benchg729

# /root/benchg729

And the result is:

Recommended flavor for this system is &#039;prescott&#039; with an average of 593 milliseconds of CPU time.

But there isn&#039;t a prescott version for x86_64 architecture</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
The benchg729 utility doesn&#8217;t work for x86_64 architecture. I wrote the following command line.</p>
<p># wget <a href="http://downloads.digium.com/pub/telephony/codec_g729/benchg729/x86-64/benchg729-1.0.7-x86_64" rel="nofollow">http://downloads.digium.com/pub/telephony/codec_g729/benchg729/x86-64/benchg729-1.0.7-x86_64</a> -O benchg729</p>
<p># chmod 500 /root/benchg729</p>
<p># /root/benchg729</p>
<p>And the error is:</p>
<p>-bash: /root/benchg729: cannot execute binary file</p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>Then I tried with x84_32 architecture with the following commands.</p>
<p># wget <a href="http://downloads.digium.com/pub/telephony/codec_g729/benchg729/x86-32/benchg729-1.0.7-x86_32" rel="nofollow">http://downloads.digium.com/pub/telephony/codec_g729/benchg729/x86-32/benchg729-1.0.7-x86_32</a> -O benchg729</p>
<p># chmod 500 /root/benchg729</p>
<p># /root/benchg729</p>
<p>And the result is:</p>
<p>Recommended flavor for this system is &#8216;prescott&#8217; with an average of 593 milliseconds of CPU time.</p>
<p>But there isn&#8217;t a prescott version for x86_64 architecture</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Retief</title>
		<link>http://blogs.digium.com/2009/02/06/digium-g729-codec-module-updated-and-new-performance-testing-tool-released/comment-page-1/#comment-17463</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Retief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.digium.com/?p=2893#comment-17463</guid>
		<description>Does this resolve the bug where running a G.729 codec over IAX2 trunking can lead to 100% processor load?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this resolve the bug where running a G.729 codec over IAX2 trunking can lead to 100% processor load?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Parker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.digium.com/2009/02/06/digium-g729-codec-module-updated-and-new-performance-testing-tool-released/comment-page-1/#comment-17343</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.digium.com/?p=2893#comment-17343</guid>
		<description>Kevin didn&#039;t mention this, but the new G.729 codec modules are also available on systems running AsteriskNOW 1.5 beta.  If you have the existing modules installed, you can do a `yum update` to get the new ones, or `yum install codec_g729a` if you don&#039;t.

It won&#039;t select the best optimization for your CPU yet, but that is something I plan on working on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin didn&#8217;t mention this, but the new G.729 codec modules are also available on systems running AsteriskNOW 1.5 beta.  If you have the existing modules installed, you can do a `yum update` to get the new ones, or `yum install codec_g729a` if you don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>It won&#8217;t select the best optimization for your CPU yet, but that is something I plan on working on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G.729 codec module for Asterisk Updated &#124; Voip Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.digium.com/2009/02/06/digium-g729-codec-module-updated-and-new-performance-testing-tool-released/comment-page-1/#comment-17303</link>
		<dc:creator>G.729 codec module for Asterisk Updated &#124; Voip Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 12:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.digium.com/?p=2893#comment-17303</guid>
		<description>[...] allows users to validate each flavor of the module against their chosen platform.According to the news release, the new modules were built with version 4.3 of the GNU C compiler to improve and enhance the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] allows users to validate each flavor of the module against their chosen platform.According to the news release, the new modules were built with version 4.3 of the GNU C compiler to improve and enhance the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Plain</title>
		<link>http://blogs.digium.com/2009/02/06/digium-g729-codec-module-updated-and-new-performance-testing-tool-released/comment-page-1/#comment-17293</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Plain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 11:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.digium.com/?p=2893#comment-17293</guid>
		<description>Hi This is great, but it seems the test tool has a few issues.

see debug below.

[root@cypbx src]# ./benchg729-1.0.2
benchg729 version 1.0.2

Use the &#039;-l&#039; option to see license information for software
included in this program.

Running tests over 60 seconds of test data.
Test run 1 for flavor &#039;i686&#039; completed in 1452 milliseconds.
Test run 2 for flavor &#039;i686&#039; completed in 1454 milliseconds.
Test run 3 for flavor &#039;i686&#039; completed in 1446 milliseconds.
Test run 4 for flavor &#039;i686&#039; completed in 1444 milliseconds.
Test run 5 for flavor &#039;i686&#039; completed in 1452 milliseconds.
Test run 1 for flavor &#039;pentium3m&#039; completed in 1298 milliseconds.
Test run 2 for flavor &#039;pentium3m&#039; completed in 1302 milliseconds.
Test run 3 for flavor &#039;pentium3m&#039; completed in 1301 milliseconds.
Test run 4 for flavor &#039;pentium3m&#039; completed in 1299 milliseconds.
Test run 5 for flavor &#039;pentium3m&#039; completed in 1304 milliseconds.
Illegal instructiond run for flavor &#039;pentium-m&#039;...

this is on a centos box with a 2.6.9-34.0.1.ELsmp kernel and dual p3 

Ian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi This is great, but it seems the test tool has a few issues.</p>
<p>see debug below.</p>
<p>[root@cypbx src]# ./benchg729-1.0.2<br />
benchg729 version 1.0.2</p>
<p>Use the &#8216;-l&#8217; option to see license information for software<br />
included in this program.</p>
<p>Running tests over 60 seconds of test data.<br />
Test run 1 for flavor &#8216;i686&#8242; completed in 1452 milliseconds.<br />
Test run 2 for flavor &#8216;i686&#8242; completed in 1454 milliseconds.<br />
Test run 3 for flavor &#8216;i686&#8242; completed in 1446 milliseconds.<br />
Test run 4 for flavor &#8216;i686&#8242; completed in 1444 milliseconds.<br />
Test run 5 for flavor &#8216;i686&#8242; completed in 1452 milliseconds.<br />
Test run 1 for flavor &#8216;pentium3m&#8217; completed in 1298 milliseconds.<br />
Test run 2 for flavor &#8216;pentium3m&#8217; completed in 1302 milliseconds.<br />
Test run 3 for flavor &#8216;pentium3m&#8217; completed in 1301 milliseconds.<br />
Test run 4 for flavor &#8216;pentium3m&#8217; completed in 1299 milliseconds.<br />
Test run 5 for flavor &#8216;pentium3m&#8217; completed in 1304 milliseconds.<br />
Illegal instructiond run for flavor &#8216;pentium-m&#8217;&#8230;</p>
<p>this is on a centos box with a 2.6.9-34.0.1.ELsmp kernel and dual p3 </p>
<p>Ian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

