Comments on: Zaptel project being renamed to DAHDI

By: Norman

Norman — Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:35:25 +0000

Thats why I strongly reccomend to everybody: To hell with digium and asterisk, go support the callweaver project at http://www.callweaver.org/, and lets forget this crappy buggy thing called asterisk. Digium can keep making their cards, which is their (real and only) area of expertise.

By: dmg

dmg — Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:00:06 +0000

Anyway, marketing and VCapital invesors do what they want with the api name and other things. Its a big move to block other competitors. I knew it would be happen!

By: kamran

kamran — Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:49:12 +0000

it would be dahditool

By: kamran

kamran — Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:47:34 +0000

then what would be the command to check card is configured or not

By: cm

cm — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:51:32 +0000

As in who’s your DAHDI?

By: Jon

Jon — Fri, 04 Jul 2008 01:07:47 +0000

Why does re-branding have anything to do with source code?? Can’t you just advertise them as DHDI boards. Or Asterisk boards? Just remove Zaptel from the website not the source code repository. Who cares what the internal classes are called.

By: kinjal

kinjal — Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:23:19 +0000

I think dahdi should be pronounced deadeye.

By: Matt

Matt — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:30:11 +0000

Why drop 2.4 support for DAHDI?
We are stuck on 2.4 kernel for a while.
Guess we won’t be going to Asterisk 1.6 for a long time!
Please rethink this!

By: Mfawa Alfred Onen

Mfawa Alfred Onen — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 15:27:33 +0000

Well The Change in Name surely craves a way for Digium to eliminate the issue of Trademark and concentrate more on Simplifying the Setup process even More with the Issue of Backward Compatibility as they have mentioned.

By: labtroll

labtroll — Sun, 15 Jun 2008 10:18:10 +0000

DADHI is fine… besides… IF IAX can be pronounce “eeks” (according to what I read in the O’Reilly’s asterisk book) , prob pronounce DADHI “Day-Dee”.